 |
| January 2005 |
| Positions
Available • Register for Upcoming
Events • Advertise in the MountainCryer
• Publication Deadline |
Deduction Extension for
Disaster Relief Introduced
The tsunami that occurred on Dec. 26, 2004 is creating
some interesting legislation. If a donor currently gives
to a charity for the relief efforts, he or she cannot take
a for the gift until next year when completing his/her 2005
tax return. However, the government indicated that they
want to encourage gifts for tsunami relief efforts by allowing
donors to apply gifts made in 2005 for tsunami relief to
2004 tax returns.
A bill has been introduced in Congress that would allow
taxpayers to apply tax deductions for tsunami relief contributions
to their 2004 tax returns. The proposal would only apply
to cash gifts made specifically for disaster relief, and
only for gifts made before Jan. 31, 2005. Congress is expected
to pass the bill unanimously on Jan. 6.
AFP supports an even playing field for charities (that is,
all charities should have equal access to tax incentives
for charitable giving). However, certain events, such as
9/11 and the tsunami relief efforts, are so far-reaching
and have such emotional pull that additional incentives
to encourage giving for relief is warranted.
The Effect of Disasters on Unrelated Nonprofits
A popular question has been the potential impact that fundraising
efforts
for tsunami relief will have on other charities. In this
case, 9/11 is a
good historical guide. It is quite probable that charities
working on issues
unrelated to tsunami relief will see a decrease in their
fundraising in the
short-term (three to four week, perhaps longer in some cases).
However, most charities will not see any long-term impact
from the tsunami
relief efforts, as has been the case historically, including
9/11 and other
major national and international tragedies.
Nonprofits must comply with CAN-SPAM
regulations
As expected, nonprofit organizations are not automatically
exempt from the final regulations recently published by
the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) regarding the CAN-SPAM
Act. Instead, the final rules closely mirror the FTC’s
original proposal that created a three-prong test to determine
if the primary purpose of an email is considered “commercial”
or “transactional or relationship” in nature.
If the purpose of the email is determined to be “transactional
or relationship” in nature, then the email is exempt
from the requirements of the CAN-SPAM Act.
Despite the decision by the FTC, the final rules should
have little impact on charities unless they traditionally
distribute numerous emails that contain only marketing or
advertising content, although a few concerns still exist.
The final regulations were not a surprise, as the FTC had
indicated it would probably take this approach in earlier
comments.
The CAN-SPAM Act was passed by Congress in 2003 to crack
down on unsolicited commercial emails. Most of the legislative
history of the bill, as well as comments by congressional
staff, indicate that the congressional intent of the legislation
was to exempt emails from nonprofit organizations.
Nevertheless, and despite comments from AFP and other organizations,
the FTC has decided to include such emails. In the final
regulations, the FTC noted that “it is possible –
or even likely – that emails between a nonprofit and
its members would constitute ‘transactional or relationship
messages,” but refused to create an actual exemption.
Positions Available Reminder
The AFP-WNC Chapter welcomes your job listings!
Postings in the print and Internet versions are free to
chapter members are $25.00 per submission for others. Please
send your notice of 100 words or less to publisher@afpwnc.org
as a Word attachment.
|
|
Mountain
Cryer Archives
|
|
|
| |